April 20, 2014

Anonymous asked: Wait do you have a sex blog?

maybe…

March 25, 2014
moon-momma:

stfufauxminists:

pansymandy:

This practically made me cry. How could this ever be okay?

[Image: An illustration is labeled as a “partial birth abortion”. It shows a person performing an intact dilation and extraction, which is described at the bottom of the image: “The surgeon pulls the fetus into the breech position. He forced scissors into the skull, removes them and inserts a suction catheter through which he suctions out the skull contents.”]
I’m going to tell you a story that my tenth grade biology teacher told me. 
So, my teacher had a friend. She was happily married, a Christian, and pregnant. She and her husband were extremely excited about the pregnancy and they couldn’t wait to be parents. She was pretty far along - probably about 7 month in. She went to get a check-up, and her doctor checked out the fetus. Well, it turns out her fetus had hydrochephalus. In this particular case, the fetus’s head had not and would not form enough to even hold the brain inside the skull. If the woman continued the pregnancy, she would give birth to a dead baby, and that’s if it didn’t die in utero and possibly cause sepsis before she had the opportunity to give birth.
So, and this was before the “partial birth abortion ban” was enacted (not when the story was told, but when it took place), the woman opted to get an intact dilation and extraction procedure (since that’s the proper medical term, “partial birth abortion” is a made up term and has no medical relevance). 
Do you know what that allowed her to do? What that allows a lot of uterus-bearers in the same predicament to do? 
She was able to hold her dead, intact fetus and mourn for it.
Now, she would have to get a procedure that literally rips the fetus apart, since apparently anti-choicers looking for a means to chip away at Roe v Wade think that this is a better alternative to the described procedure above. As the law currently stands, it is now impossible for people like the woman I described to have their fetuses aborted intact so that they can hold them like they wanted to. It is impossible for women like the one I described to have a body to mourn over. 
So good job. Because you’re too ignorant to actually know why uterus-bearers get late-term abortion, specifically intact D & X procedures, you’ve essentially made it much harder for those that are experiencing the difficult choice to end a wanted pregnancy to mourn and move on. 
But hey, go ahead and continue to consider yourself compassionate. I guess ignorance really is bliss, especially when you can hold up illustrations of medical procedures you don’t understand and hide behind them as if they have any meaning in the face of the reality that you refuse to acknowledge.

^^woah

people just need to shut the hell up and let the woman choose what she wants to do. my heart goes to her and her husband not just because of the loss of their child, but because of the pro-lifers that “know” she was wrong and she should suffer another two months with a baby the mother knows will not live. every time a pro-life advocate holds up a picture of a dead fetus, we should ask why was this fetus aborted in the first place. what is THAT fetus’ story. until they know, they should put their signs and banners and backwards-ass rhetoric back in their ass where it belongs. 

moon-momma:

stfufauxminists:

pansymandy:

This practically made me cry. How could this ever be okay?

[Image: An illustration is labeled as a “partial birth abortion”. It shows a person performing an intact dilation and extraction, which is described at the bottom of the image: “The surgeon pulls the fetus into the breech position. He forced scissors into the skull, removes them and inserts a suction catheter through which he suctions out the skull contents.”]

I’m going to tell you a story that my tenth grade biology teacher told me. 

So, my teacher had a friend. She was happily married, a Christian, and pregnant. She and her husband were extremely excited about the pregnancy and they couldn’t wait to be parents. She was pretty far along - probably about 7 month in. She went to get a check-up, and her doctor checked out the fetus. Well, it turns out her fetus had hydrochephalus. In this particular case, the fetus’s head had not and would not form enough to even hold the brain inside the skull. If the woman continued the pregnancy, she would give birth to a dead baby, and that’s if it didn’t die in utero and possibly cause sepsis before she had the opportunity to give birth.

So, and this was before the “partial birth abortion ban” was enacted (not when the story was told, but when it took place), the woman opted to get an intact dilation and extraction procedure (since that’s the proper medical term, “partial birth abortion” is a made up term and has no medical relevance). 

Do you know what that allowed her to do? What that allows a lot of uterus-bearers in the same predicament to do? 

She was able to hold her dead, intact fetus and mourn for it.

Now, she would have to get a procedure that literally rips the fetus apart, since apparently anti-choicers looking for a means to chip away at Roe v Wade think that this is a better alternative to the described procedure above. As the law currently stands, it is now impossible for people like the woman I described to have their fetuses aborted intact so that they can hold them like they wanted to. It is impossible for women like the one I described to have a body to mourn over. 

So good job. Because you’re too ignorant to actually know why uterus-bearers get late-term abortion, specifically intact D & X procedures, you’ve essentially made it much harder for those that are experiencing the difficult choice to end a wanted pregnancy to mourn and move on. 

But hey, go ahead and continue to consider yourself compassionate. I guess ignorance really is bliss, especially when you can hold up illustrations of medical procedures you don’t understand and hide behind them as if they have any meaning in the face of the reality that you refuse to acknowledge.

^^woah

people just need to shut the hell up and let the woman choose what she wants to do. my heart goes to her and her husband not just because of the loss of their child, but because of the pro-lifers that “know” she was wrong and she should suffer another two months with a baby the mother knows will not live. every time a pro-life advocate holds up a picture of a dead fetus, we should ask why was this fetus aborted in the first place. what is THAT fetus’ story. until they know, they should put their signs and banners and backwards-ass rhetoric back in their ass where it belongs. 

(via 3decadestoolate)

March 24, 2014

(Source: ruinedchildhood)

March 15, 2014
comedycentral:

You can’t rollerskate in a buffalo herd.

comedycentral:

You can’t rollerskate in a buffalo herd.

March 13, 2014

(via ilovecharts)

February 15, 2014

(Source: judas-christ, via julia---marie)

February 5, 2014

baelthezaar:

Perfect.

(Source: ideaorideal, via 3decadestoolate)

February 3, 2014
This is the punishment God gave for eating the apple. 

This is the punishment God gave for eating the apple. 

(Source: enamouravecamour)

January 10, 2014
seventeeneleven:

honestly, how did they get away with this? xD

seventeeneleven:

honestly, how did they get away with this? xD

January 10, 2014

(Source: tastefullyoffensive, via catgasm)

January 4, 2014

from Vice’s mini documentary on the Suicide Forest in Japan (x)

Watch this. Now. Hauntingly beautiful.

(Source: vrueppellii, via butter--butt)

January 4, 2014

TELL ME IM PRETTY

i can hear her voice in my head. i think i watched too much of that show.

(Source: crouton.net, via ruinedchildhood)

January 1, 2014

favorite character.

(Source: pinkmanjesse, via ruinedchildhood)

January 1, 2014
ruinedchildhood:

R.I.P. James Avery 

ruinedchildhood:

R.I.P. James Avery 

(Source: madeupmonkeyshit)

4:26pm
  
Filed under: Uncle Phil 
December 16, 2013

(Source: apriki, via julia---marie)

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »